Toyota Recall: NHTSA Considers New Rules For "Smart" Brakes; Black Boxes

Brett Emison
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 461
Visit Brett Emison on FacebookVisit Brett Emison on LinkedInVisit Brett Emison on TwitterVisit Brett Emison on Avvo
Posted by Brett EmisonMarch 11, 2010 6:13 PM

In the fallout of Toyota's massive sudden acceleration recall, the Wall Street Journal reports that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ("NHTSA") is considering tougher regulations requiring "smart brake" technology and "black box" data recorders for US vehicles.

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Obama administration is considering new rules on the design of automobiles, including possible requirements that cars be equipped with advanced-brake technology and "black boxes" that record crash data, the top U.S. highway-safety regulator said Thursday.

***

In written testimony he submitted to the [House Energy and Commerce] committee, Strickland said the administration is prepared to require that all cars be equipped with brake-override systems, which are designed to ensure that a car stops if both the gas and brake pedals are depressed, if regulators determine such a move would significantly improve vehicle safety.

"If our review indicates that requiring this feature could substantially reduce the most dangerous kinds of sudden acceleration, we will strongly consider a rulemaking to require it," he testified.

Strickland also said that the administration is studying whether to require that all vehicles be equipped with event-data recorders, also known as black boxes. Many U.S. vehicles are already equipped with the black boxes. Some are also equipped with brake-override systems.

The hearing will examine NHTSA's role in tracking defects, and is at least the fourth congressional hearing in recent weeks related to Toyota Motor Corp.'s recall of some eight million vehicles worldwide for sudden-acceleration problems.

Why does NHTSA need to tell Toyota to install critical safety devices like "black box" data recorders and brake override systems? NHTSA's requirements are the minimum standards. Car makers can -- and are expected to -- do more than the bare minimum required by NHTSA.

Car makers like GM and Ford have used "black box" data recorders for years. Companies like Chrysler, Nissan, Audi and other car makers have used "smart brake" technology for more than a decade. Where has Toyota been during all of this?

Toyota has actually installed "black box" data recorder in many of its vehicles. However, Toyota calls its own data recording technology "experimental" and unreliable. Why would Toyota install unreliable data recorders in its vehicles?

So Toyota's "black boxes" are "experimental" and there is only one laptop in the entire United States that can interpret the data? And Toyota fights tooth and nail to keep from having to produce this information in lawsuits across the country... going so far as to settle the claim quickly if the Court orders production of this information.

Other auto makers make their data recorders available to the public and to law enforcement.

U.S. auto makers General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC have provided their black-box data formats to Bosch Diagnostics, a unit of German auto supplier Robert Bosch GmbH that makes tools that download crash logs from vehicles made by those auto makers. Those tools are widely used by police, crash investigators and attorneys, and the auto makers don't question the accuracy of the data retrieved with them.

I want to know what these black boxes say that Toyota doesn't want us to know.

Toyota has also said it would install "smart brake" technology in vehicles going forward.

That only puts Toyota 15 years behind the curve. Since Toyota's first recall announcement, I have called on Toyota to implement smart brake technology that would override an out-of-control gas pedal or throttle. Several weeks ago, USA Today reported that smart brake or smart pedal technology has been used by other car makers for more than a decade and would have cost less than $1 per vehicle to design and implement.

Why did Toyota refuse to utilize this critical safety device for so long? Was $1 too much to spend to ensure that innocent drivers wouldn't be injured or killed by runaway vehicles? Was it simply easier to "blame the driver" and call the problem "driver error" rather than acknowledge this serious safety defect?

It is time that Toyota is finally held accountable for putting profits over safety and for putting money ahead of human life.

You can learn more at our safety blog and become a fan of Langdon & Emison on Facebook.

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Tom
Posted by Tom
March 11, 2010 9:36 PM

The good news about the recent Prius accident in NYC (if there is any) is that the airbags went off. Toyota has said their black box stores data from 5 seconds before the airbag sensor detects a crash to 2 seconds afterwards. Therefore, we all should expect Toyota to publish the data they download from the black box. I am sure they will have a press release out immediately, if the black box shows there was no pressure applied to the brake pedal. If the data shows otherwise, let's wait and see what Toyota reports.

tedi
Posted by tedi
March 13, 2010 8:01 AM

Ineresting article

How Real are the Defects in Toyota's Cars?
Mar 12 2010, 2:56 PM ET

More ...

One of the great mysteries of the Toyota debacle is why Toyota ignored the complaints for so long. Or at least it's a mystery to reporters on cable news, abetted by consumer advocates who were all too happy to imply that Toyota didn't care how many people it killed as long as they made a profit.


Maybe so, but I doubt it; you don't usually make a profit by killing your customers. It's too risky, in this age of nosy regulators and angry consumer activists.


Their behavior becomes a bit more explicable when you consider this argument from Ted Frank:


The Los Angeles Times recently did a story detailing all of the NHTSA reports of Toyota "sudden acceleration" fatalities, and, though the Times did not mention it, the ages of the drivers involved were striking.
In the 24 cases where driver age was reported or readily inferred, the drivers included those of the ages 60, 61, 63, 66, 68, 71, 72, 72, 77, 79, 83, 85, 89--and I'm leaving out the son whose age wasn't identified, but whose 94-year-old father died as a passenger.

Brett EmisonInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Brett Emison
March 13, 2010 10:03 AM

Tedi,

You said:

"One of the great mysteries of the Toyota debacle is why Toyota ignored the complaints for so long. Or at least it's a mystery to reporters on cable news, abetted by consumer advocates who were all too happy to imply that Toyota didn't care how many people it killed as long as they made a profit.

Maybe so, but I doubt it; you don't usually make a profit by killing your customers. It's too risky, in this age of nosy regulators and angry consumer activists."

So you think Toyota would not put profits over safety not because it is wrong to maim, injure, burn or kill people from a known defect, but because we live in an "age of nosy regulators and angry consumer activists"?

You see the evidence and choose to blame those trying to fix the problem rather than those who created the problem. Or is it that you actually believe "nosy regulators" and "angry consumer activists" created the problem?

Why do you think regulators are nosy? Why are consumer activists angry? Could it because Toyota has covered up this problem for nearly a decade and turned a blind eye when people were dying across the country? Hmmmm?

Do you understand that Toyota has admitted there really is a sudden acceleration problem (Toyota just steadfastly refuses to acknowledge that it could be cause by electronics)?

Do you understand that Toyota has admitted the sudden acceleration problem was at least partially caused because Toyota put safety behind growth in market share?

Do you understand that Toyota has admitted a culture that discouraged safety improvements in current line vehicles because of production slow downs and cost?

Do you really think that one of the world's largest corporations would not put its shareholders (and its bottom line) ahead of safety?

Do you remember the GM side-saddle gas tanks? What about RJ Reynolds tobacco? What about asbestos manufacturers (who killed not only their cosumers, but their line workers as well). What about lead paint manufacturers? What about DDT manufacturers? What about the Ford Pinto?

This list could go on and on and on... filled with companies who put profits over safety... just like when Toyota failed to install a "smart brake" system for the last 15 years b/c it would have cost pennies per vehicle.

For my family's sake and for your family's sake, thank God we live in "age of nosy regulators and angry consumer activists."

Comments for this article are closed. You may still contact the author directly by email.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Kansas City

InjuryBoard Kansas City RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Kansas City is brought to you by Langdon & Emison

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Langdon & Emison (800) 397-4910 www.langdonemison.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Langdon & Emison tries cases across the country from offices in St. Louis and near Kansas City. Greater Kansas City areas include Kansas City, Independence, Lee's Summit, Blue Springs, Raytown, Gladstone, Liberty, Grandview, Belton, Sedalia, Warrensburg, Marshall, Raymore, Excelsior Springs.
911 Main StP.O. Box 220, Lexington, Missouri 64067 [ Show Map ]110 East Lockwood, St. Louis, Missouri 63119 [ Show Map ]
Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address